Mark Zuckerberg’s acquisition of Instagram and WhatsApp in 2012 and 2014 respectively helped its social media empire to reach billions of people.
More than a decade later, the US Federal Trade Commission on Monday is targeting deals in a historic no -confidence case set to go into the test on Monday, alleging that the acquisitions were illegal, should never have been approved and it should be broken.
The FTC argues that Meta’s Instagram and WhatsApp procurement is “killer acquisition”, which stopped companies from competing and this was a mistake to allow deals. To support its case, FTC will argue that the quality of meta apps declined, with the most increased advertisements and weak privacy security.
The FTC challenge, which will kick before the US District Judge James Boseburg in Washington, is an existential threat to the dominance of the meta. A breakup will disrupt some of the world’s most popular digital products, undo the years of integration between market leaders apps and Facebook, and raise serious questions about evaluating and approving government deals.
Meta’s market cap to $ 1.3 trillion (about Rs 1,11,85,447 crore), and given its dependence on advertising revenue from Instagram, a breakup risk of hundreds of billions of billions of dollars in market price.
Finely viewed tests will include a parade of executive witnesses, including Zuckerberg and former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg.
“It is believed that the evidence will show that Instagram and WhatsApp acquisition have been good for competition and consumers,” Meta said in a statement. The company also destroyed FTC to challenge deals after more than a decade.
“Trump-Wance FTC may not be more ready for this test,” FTC spokesperson Joe Simonson. “This agency is working with some of the country’s most talented and hardworking lawyers.”
Police competition
The matter will test the government’s capacity of the police competition in the fast -moving technical sector, which has developed a lot since the FTC suit was filed during the Donald Trump administration earlier. Since then, billionaire Elon Musk bought Twitter Inc., Tikok became one of the world’s most prominent social media apps, and Meta launched rival products to compete with both of them.
Zuckerberg has appealed to the Trump administration over the last several months with relaxed material rules and facts of facts and abolition of DEI initiative. Wall Street Journal reported that privately, they have advocated Trump to intervene and settle the case, although experts believe that Trump is unlikely to intervene at this level.
This does not mean that Trump cannot weigh later. If the meta loses, it is possible that the trump appeals can put pressure on the Commissioners of Taps to settle during the process, the experts said. Trump shot two Democratic members of the Commission in March and already increased their strength at the agency. They are fighting their dismissal in the commissioner court, while the agency is being run by two remaining Republicans.
Jennifer Ri, senior litigation analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, said, “It will be in the minds of those commissioners that if he can fire and fire only two Democrats and fire them, they can definitely be removed.” “So if they do not bid her, or go against her, they are fired.”
“To prepare oneself”
FTC president Andrew Ferguson told Bloomberg TV last month that the agency “was gearing up for the trial”, but last week told reporters in Washington that if Trump instructed him to leave the case, he would follow the legal orders, saying that he would be surprised.
A week after the Meta trial begins, two floors above Boseburg’s court, alphabet’s Google would argue why a judge illegally not face a breakup after a monopoly in the online search market. Cases suggest that the new administration is not returning to the major antitrust cases filed against technical giants under Trump’s first term.
A final decision on the Meta case will host how social media is defined, and whether Meta dominates that market. FTC will focus on how people communicate with friends and family – it is called “personal social networking services” market, which claims that it mainly incorporates messages and media shared between close contacts.
The agency believes that only Snap Ink’s Snapchat and Mate a very small company competing with dry fruits. It also exposes many-de-faced contestants including MySpace.
The test will reveal hundreds of emails and other internal communication about the company’s development strategy in the last 15 years, including the reasons declared for the Instagram deal quoted in Zuckerberg’s FTC complaint: “It is better to buy better than competition.”
Meta will disagree and argue that it faces acute competition from innumerable contestants beyond Snap, including X, Ticketkok and YouTube of Elon Musk, which is owned by Google. Meta has spent years to mimic popular features from other platforms, a strategy that will argue that jackfruit displays a deliberate effort to maintain consumer needs in the market.
While FTC says Instagram and Taketok are not social networking competitors, Meta plan to prove that they compete by highlighting the temporary ban of Tikok in January, which led to a spike in use for meta products. The FTC will be allowed to use testimony from Tiktok and Pinterest that speaks in its version of the “competitive landscape”.
High-profile case
Boasberg admitted during a pre-testing product demo last week that he is not a specialist in the Meta offerings. He said that he never had any account with the company, and asked “what is the point” to click “Like” on a post? But he is not far from high-profile matters. Boseberg is also overseeing the government’s controversial exile for Venezuela, causing public rebellion from Trump, in addition to a case, top American officials and White House advisors have discussed adjacent military action in Yemen through a signal chat.
A resolution on the meta can be overcome for years. Boseberg will first decide whether Meta has violated the law with its acquisition. If he finds the company, there will be a second phase of hearing about fixing the market.
The case is not the only meta quarrel with FTC. FTC Meta is also accusing Meta of violating the terms of the 2019 confidentiality settlement, under which the company had paid a $ 5 billion fine to solve allegations that violates an earlier agreement focused on its data security practices. Meta is also facing a trial in delaware this summer.
According to Wolf Research LLC analyst Shweta Khajuria, many people on Wall Street are expecting an agreement in the antitrust case, who said in an interview that investors are hoping that Trump now helps affect the results that their relationship has improved with Zuckerberg.
Khajuria said, “I don’t think investors are breaking for a breakup.” “A compromise will have a more favorable result than pulling it out, which leaves an overhang on the stock.”
Âİ 2025 Bloomberg LP
