Earlier, the US government had argued in the court that the petition for the certificate of the certificate should be denied. US Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar said this in filing before the Supreme Court on December.
He said that Rana was not entitled to provide relief from extradition in India in this case.
In his “petitions for a writ of certificate to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the ninth circuit, Rana argued that he was tried to be in the federal court in Illinois (Chicago) in the northern district. He was acquitted and acquitted. In 2008, a terrorist attack on Mumbai.
Prelogar disagree.
“The government does not believe that all the conduct on which India wants extradition was covered by the government’s prosecution in this matter. For example, India’s allegations of forgery are based on the conduct that were not charged in the United States: Use of false information in an application by the petitioner formally submitted to the Reserve Bank of India, a branch office of the immigration law center To open, ”said the US Solicitor General.
“It is not clear that the decision of the jury in this case – including a conspiracy allegations and was somewhat difficult to purses it – means that he was” convicted or acquitted “on all those specific conduct” Which India has accused, “Pilogar said.
Rana is associated with Pakistani-American terrorist David Coleman Headley, one of the main conspirators of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks.
A total of 166 people including six Americans were killed in a 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, with 10 Pakistani militants siege over 60 hours, attacked and killed people at reputed and important places in Mumbai.
